Tampilkan postingan dengan label February 02. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label February 02. Tampilkan semua postingan

Minggu, 02 Februari 2014

Her: The existential movie about post-singularity video games onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com

Written By 12; About: Her: The existential movie about post-singularity video games onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com on Minggu, 02 Februari 2014

onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com Her: The existential movie about post-singularity video games

Her: The existential movie about post-singularity video games S


Having finally seen Her, I'm surprised to find the distinct lack of chatter this film is generating among genre fans. This film takes an existential look at the (potential? inevitable?) singularity, and shows viewers the future of video gaming. Be warned, there be spoilers here (although not about the main plot).


The Singularity as Story Material


Her is advertised as a quirky dramedy (apparently that is a word) in which Joaquin Phoenix plays a non-social loner who distances himself from others and has difficulty with human emotions (I know, what a stretch) who falls in love with an unbelievably attractive character played by Scarlett Johansson (also a stretch), who never actually appears on film, because she essentially plays the voice of a super-advanced Siri (okay, ScarJo being hot without being seen, this is new).


In reality, however, this is a film about the singularity, with the romantic main plot serving as the MacGuffin moving audiences along with the development of artificial intelligence. Kind of the reverse of another film by director Spike Jonze, I'm Here, which uses a post-singularity world as the setting for a quirky dramedy (feels weird, using that word).


How will artificial intelligences react to us? How will we treat them? Will they fit into society? What does it mean to be a "person"? Is a person worth being? How fast will artificial intelligences evolve, and how will that affect mankind?


All these questions are addressed as Phoenix's Theodore tries to find love.


Her: The existential movie about post-singularity video games S


The film is not shy about its journey into an existentialist quagmire. It even provides an interesting cameo by 1960s free-thinker Alan Watts.


Because existentialism is such a central theme of the movie, legal questions about artificial intelligence and IP-protection are not really addressed in the film. Interestingly, just as I found myself thinking "what would the courts say about-?" a lawyer character was introduced to the cast and she casually accepted Johansson's Samantha without a second thought, as if to say "yes, there may be legal questions about all this, but let's not worry about that right now."


The Future of Video Gaming - You Will Want It Now


The other thing sci-fi and tech fans may notice right away is the omnipresent-but-not-overt status of video games in this film set 15 minutes into the future.


Her: The existential movie about post-singularity video games S


Any character in this film, when presented with the topic of gaming, treats it much the same way as someone today might talk about movies or TV. That is to say, it is both pervasive and accepted.


Even Olivia Wilde's ridiculously-too-hot-for-a-blind-date character listens intently to Theodore's description of his latest gaming session and reacts with intense interest, laughter and relevant anecdotes. When was the last time you described playing a video game to someone who had never played that game, and they responded with rapt attention?


Her: The existential movie about post-singularity video games S


Another character works in game design, and shows off a casual RPG game about trying to be the best mom in the school district. "Mom points" are awarded for things like controlling your children's behavior, cutting in line to get your kid to school first, and bribing school faculty with baked goods - all in an effort to make the other moms jealous of your mad mom skills.


This is a game people would play. And it would kill in the handheld market.


More importantly, however, is the main game featured in the film. Here is a key scene from fairly early in the flick (Warning: NSFW language).


Did you see that? How much do you want to play that game right now?


The game uses Kinect-like hand gestures to control an open-world exploratory game that utilizes deceptively simple artificial intelligence to challenge players into thinking outside the box. Hell, the AI character even interacts with non-playing spectators and comments on unrelated images shown on screen. (Is it just me, or does this seem like something Tim Schafer wishes he could make?)


The thing is, all video game references in this movie seem like very real things that could happen to games in the near future.


Aside from the general advancement of game technology, there is an ever-increasing emphasis put into writing and world design and as each passing generation is exposed to games more and more, the general widespread acceptance and excitement for games can and will grow.


To Sum


Her is a great film, but more importantly, it has interesting things to say about where technology could take us as a society, and fun things to say about where video games are headed.


And, if you don't want to spend hard-earned cash on movie tickets or sit through a just-a-bit-over-two-hour film (or that the idea is lampoonable), feel free to watch a previous Spike Jonze joint, I'm Here, which clocks in at about 30 minutes.


onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com Her: The existential movie about post-singularity video games

Big Ass Spider! Delivers Big Ass Fun onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com

onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com Big Ass Spider! Delivers Big Ass Fun

Big Ass Spider! Delivers Big Ass Fun


Big Ass Spider! is a special effects-driven bigsploitation/assploitation/spidsploitation action adventure comedy extravaganza written by Gregory Gieras, directed by Mike Mendez and starring Greg Grunberg as lonely-heart pest exterminator and savior of mankind, Alex Mathis.


The film opens with Alex going to the emergency room for treatment after suffering a bite from an ordinary, small ass spider. While Alex flirts awkwardly with his improbably hot care provider of normal-ass size, the coroner is busy in the morgue examining the body of a dead ass scientist. When the coroner is attacked by a medium ass spider hiding in the scientist's body bag, Alex agrees to slay the beast in lieu of paying his expensive ass hospital bill. So much for Obamacare, amirite?


When Major Ass Army Guy Ray Wise arrives with his foxy ass army lady assistant and a smart ass scientist who explains that the spider in question had been exposed to an experimental growth serum intended to end world hunger by creating big ass cows, big ass chickens and big ass strawberries, Alex and his sidekick, Jose "The Mexican Robin" Ramos, team up with a big ass squad of tough ass army dudes, to kick the holy LV-426 out of the rapidly expanding Areanus gluteus maximus.


Big Ass Spider! is one of those movies that you can pretty much trust your spidey sense on. If you're the type of person who is interested in movies about big ass spiders, look no further. All films make a contract with the viewer. When you go to see The Road Warrior, there had better be some road warring. Bridge on the River Kwai had better have a bridge and it had better be on the River Kwai. Sharknado...well you get the point. On this score, Big Ass Spider! holds up its end of the cinematic bargain: there is a spider and its ass is undeniably huge.


But beyond this, Big Ass Spider! exceeds expectations. The spider effects are decent, the action is well paced, the characters are appealing and most of the jokes are funny. Even without a cameo by Lloyd Kaufman (The Toxic Avenger), it would still be apparent that Mendez and Gieras are paying homage to their Tromatic childhoods. Big Ass Spider! is a low-budget film that hearkens back to the days of the drive-in, the midnight movie and the straight-to-VHS monster schlock-fest.


Like the filmmakers of a generation ago who drew inspiration from the Saturday morning serials of their youth and ushered in a new era of feature-length adventures, Mendez and Gieras have taken up the mantle of their forbears and moved the ball further down the cinematic field. Comparing Big Ass Spider! to Raiders of the Lost Ark is...okay...a stretch. But in an era of filmmaking that even Steven Spielberg and George Lucas think is unsustainable, surviving Peak Blockbuster means loving what you create, whether the budget is $1 or $100 million.


It would equally be a stretch to say that Big Ass Spider! represents the last, best hope for an art form buckling under the weight of hit-driven risk aversion and increasingly narrow margins on increasingly bloated budgets, but it does represent the kind of commitment to entertainment that will inspire the next generation of filmmakers armed with small ass budgets and big ass dreams.


Big Ass Spider! has big ass heart, and big ass heart counts for a big ass lot.


Big Ass Spider! is available on Blu-Ray, Amazon and YouTube rental.


Jason Shankel is a big ass writer and creative developer who knows that with big ass power comes big ass responsibility.


onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com Big Ass Spider! Delivers Big Ass Fun

LEGO Gets Told Off by a Seven-Year-Old Girl onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com

onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com LEGO Gets Told Off by a Seven-Year-Old Girl

LEGO Gets Told Off by a Seven-Year-Old Girl S


A seven-year-old girl named Charlotte has taken LEGO to task for not only making more "boy people" than "lego girls," but sending the former on adventures while the latter "sit at home."


"All the girls did was sit at home, go to the beach, and shop, and they had no jobs," writes Charlotte, "but the boys went on adventures, worked, saved people, and had jobs, even swam with sharks."


Her request is simple: "I want you to make more lego girl people and let them go on adventures and have fun ok!?! from Charlotte. Thank you."


Call us crazy, but we think Charlotte's on to something here. After all, what good is a visit to the beach if you're not going to swim with any sharks?


LEGO Gets Told Off by a Seven-Year-Old Girl S


LEGO has been criticized before for failing to bridge the gender gap in its line of minifigs. To its credit, they've made moves in recent years to do so, but the company still has a ways to go. For an excellent overview of LEGO's production history of female minifigs, the careers they do (or don't) get to have, and the adventures they do (or don't) get to go on, see this excellent post by Maia Weinstock, which was published last year – around the same time LEGO released its first female lab-scientist minifig (pictured at left – Photo Credit: Maia Weinstock).


[SocImages]


onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com LEGO Gets Told Off by a Seven-Year-Old Girl

Sabtu, 01 Februari 2014

J.K. Rowling says Hermione should have married Harry, not Ron onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com

Written By 12; About: J.K. Rowling says Hermione should have married Harry, not Ron onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com on Sabtu, 01 Februari 2014

onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com J.K. Rowling says Hermione should have married Harry, not Ron

J.K. Rowling says Hermione should have married Harry, not Ron S


Are you sitting down? You might want to sit down. In an interview with Emma Watson, J.K. Rowling has admitted that she regrets pairing Hermione with Ron instead of Harry, chalking the Hermione/Ron marriage up to "a form of wish fulfillment."


The comments were obtained by The Sunday Times, which tweeted a preview of tomorrow's front page just hours ago. You can read it for yourself below (click the image to enlarge, and note the headline on the left), but here's the gist:



[Rowling] said: "I wrote the Hermione/Ron relationship as a form of wish fulfillment. That's how it was conceived, really. For reasons that have very little to do with literature and far more to do with me clinging to the plot as I first imagined it, Hermione ended up with Ron."


She added: "I know, I'm sorry, I can hear the rage and fury it might cause some fans, but if I'm absolutely honest, distance has given me perspective on that. It was a choice I made for very personal reasons, not for reasons of credibility. Am I breaking people's hearts by saying this? I hope not."



J.K. Rowling says Hermione should have married Harry, not Ron S


The interview is slated to appear in a forthcoming issue of Wonderland magazine, for which Watson served as guest-editor. Watson, for her part, seemed to agree with Rowling, commenting that she thinks "there are fans out there who know that too and who wonder whether Ron would have really been able to make her happy." The comments obtained by The Sunday Times also seem to indicate that Rowling thinks Ron and Hermione "would have ended up needing relationship counseling." Oy.


We can't help but notice that the Sunday Times article continues on page 7 of the paper, so it's possible that there's more to this story than meets the eye. Is this some sort of joke? A plot to drum up buzz over Watson's guest-editorship at Wonderland? Or has Rowling really, truly decided to rekindle the HP ship-wars into a category five wildfire? While we're waiting for the other shoe to drop, talk amongst yourselves – I'm betting some of you out there are feeling pretty vindicated right about now.


Obligatory:


[The Sunday Times via Hypable]


ht Kat!


onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com J.K. Rowling says Hermione should have married Harry, not Ron

In memory of the men and women who lost their lives in the quest for space exploration. onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com

onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com In memory of the men and women who lost their lives in the quest for space exploration.


In memory of the men and women who lost their lives in the quest for space exploration. NASA Administrator Charles Bolden participates in a wreath laying ceremony as part of NASA's Day of Remembrance, Friday, Jan. 31, 2014, at Arlington National Cemetery.


Photo Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls


Related


Today, NASA pays homage to its fallen astronauts with an Agency-wide "Day of Remembrance." This week marks the anniversaries of three NASA… Read…




onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com In memory of the men and women who lost their lives in the quest for space exploration.

It's hallucination time on Helix! onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com

onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com It's hallucination time on Helix!

It's hallucination time on Helix! S


Finally the good guys are figuring stuff out on Helix, and in last night's episode we got a pulse-pounding dose of real action. Also, a Futurama reference. Spoilers ahead!


Alan Is On the Case!


At last Alan has stopped mooning over Peter for long enough to actually figure some crap out. Like, you know, how to modify the mega-antiviral serum to make it work better. Maybe even as an antidote or something! He also manages to finally figure out that Daniel and Hiroshi are kinda sorta on his side, and that Sergio is a Doreen-killing psycho. Good job, Alan! He even scored a kiss from Sarah, who was tripping on morphine.


Once Alan and Daniel have teamed up, it's only a matter of time before they loot Sergio's room, and discover — in with copies of Nature magazine — his comms equipment and a really ugly tablet device with all of Doreen's research on it. Oh and also, they find his poorly-hidden stash of explosives. So, yeah. Sergio wasn't exactly a brainfarm when it came to hiding his nefarious deeds. Clearly his superiors know that too, because when he reports in that he's finished his mission and is ready for extraction, they tell him to "find Dr. Hvit."


It's hallucination time on Helix! S


Oh and an aside — have you noticed the uneven way this show does the "gotcha grossout" scenes, like a rat climbing out of Doreen's mouth? The rat thing was just silly felt totally unnecessary. But then you get a scene like the one where Sergio lights the frozen, dead monkeys on fire and it sounds like they're screaming. Chill-inducing! Does that mean you never really die once you've been black goo zombified?


When this show tries to tart itself up with the grossouts it fails. But it's brilliant at the subtle, creepy suspense stuff.


Julia's Two Special Friends


Hiroshi has given up his My Creepy Scrapbook in favor of a hard-earned face-to-face meeting with Julia. He stabs himself in the side, faking that the Crazypants Guy did it, and limps around the quarantine level until Julia finds him and offers to help. Cue a long scene where they limp to the first aid kit on the other end of the level, past zombies and Julia's hallucinations (so sad that Jaye is just a hallucination because she is badass).


It's hallucination time on Helix! S


Julia's hallucination friend Jaye keeps warning her that she might have been at the facility when she was a little girl, which is why her initials are carved into the wall. Jaye also notes that Hiroshi is full of shit when he tells Julia that he got horrible burns on his back from trying to rescue his daughter in a fire.


"You remind me of her," Hiroshi says tearfully to Julia, and OK DUH we know now that Julia is either his daughter or some kind of clone of his daughter. Which is kind of nice, I guess. That means Daniel is Julia's brother, and Alan and Peter are sort of Hiroshi's sons-in-law, and I'm sure we can add just a few more people to this incestuous polygon before the show is over.


It's hallucination time on Helix! S


Anyway, Hiroshi has managed to get his little meeting with Julia, but we aren't sure yet what his goal is — other than to win her trust.


Sarah Please Shut Up


Meanwhile, Sarah is still covering up her brain tumor by medicating with morphine. Which is why she accidentally kisses Alan, who sort of kisses her back and sort of rebuffs her. Classy. Also, she decides to help her sick pal die with an OD on morphine, once the disease starts making roomie barf black goo.


It's hallucination time on Helix! S


Remember the monkeys, people! I guarantee that this "fatal" OD will not turn out to be fatal in the end.


Especially now, because we've discovered — dum dum dum! — that when Alan talks to Peter about needing hope that Peter's "neural activity" machine goes ping. Is Peter coming back online? Is he man or vector?


Visit to Futurama


Which brings us to Dr. Hvit, who is in the "white room," which we discover is a joking term that the scientists have for the arctic itself. "We're all in the white room!" Dr. Serum says helpfully. Ohhh, OK. That was kind of a dud reveal.


But it's actually not such a dud when we discover that Hiroshi and Daniel have been hiding Hvit's frozen head in a plastic bucket in some high-tech blinky light unit under the snow. When Daniel grabbed Hvit's head bucket I seriously thought it was going to start talking, like Richard Nixon in Futurama. Let's hope that happens at some point.


It's hallucination time on Helix! S


But then Sergio swipes the head bucket from Daniel! And then Alan stupidly decides he'll race out into the snow to find Sergio, even though Alan has absolutely no idea what he'll do and Sergio is a trained military badass dude! Which — yeah, as soon as Sergio runs into Alan, he punches Alan in the face and runs off with Hvit's head and his tablet. (Which of course Alan had in his pocket because HE'S AN IDIOT.)


But then!!! Daniel rallies and stabs Sergio just as Sergio is sending the "please fucking extract me now" signal. Daniel strips him of all his warm clothes, leaving Sergio to freeze to death at the extraction point. Without Nixon's head. At least we got to enjoy a little unwrapped Sergio, despite the fact that he and Daniel didn't make out even a little bit. Though I guess Sergio did give some head! OMG I am so funny.


It's hallucination time on Helix! S


So tune in next week, when Nixon's head tells everybody what's what, and Hiroshi and Julia have a tearful family reunion with a bunch of other hallucinations.


onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com It's hallucination time on Helix!

Neil Gaiman reading Green Eggs and Ham is pure wonderfulness onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com

onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com Neil Gaiman reading Green Eggs and Ham is pure wonderfulness

Neil Gaiman reading Green Eggs and Ham is pure wonderfulness


This newly released video of Gaiman reading Dr. Seuss's iconic children's book is one of the best things we've seen all week.


Gaiman read the book in recognition of the Worldbuilders 2014 charity – a philanthropic effort orchestrated by epic fantasy author Patrick Rothfuss and founded on the premise of "geeks doing good" – hitting its $500,000 stretch goal. Via the charity's website:



Neil could read the telephone book (remember those?) and we'd be happy, but no, he's going to tackle one of the most enduring pieces of modern literature: Green Eggs and Ham. We think we'll like it, Sam I Am.



We couldn't agree more. Now if only we could get Gaiman to read some of these renditions of Dr. Seuss, we could die happy.


onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com Neil Gaiman reading Green Eggs and Ham is pure wonderfulness

An unbelievably gruesome epidemic is ravaging starfish populations onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com

onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com An unbelievably gruesome epidemic is ravaging starfish populations

An unbelievably gruesome epidemic is ravaging starfish populations


A mysterious illness has claimed the lives of tens of thousands of starfish on North America's west coast, and its symptoms are horrifying. Dubbed "sea star wasting syndrome," the arms of an infected individual will twist into knots, develop lesions, and finally crawl away in opposite directions until they tear away from its body, allowing its insides to spill out.


Researchers still aren't sure how the disease spreads, let alone where it comes from. What they do know is that sea stars occupy a pivotal niche in ocean ecosystems, and large-scale die outs are almost certainly a very bad sign. In a fascinating piece that's as sad as it is disturbing, PBS special correspondent Katie Campbell reports on how researchers and citizen scientists are teaming up to investigate the spread of the mysterious syndrome:


Want to help researchers figure out what's going on? Head here and here to learn how you can help scientists track the incidence and spread of the syndrome with photographs and the hashtag #sickstarfish.


[PBS]


onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com An unbelievably gruesome epidemic is ravaging starfish populations

Columbia’s Demise 11 Years Ago Sparked Regular Shuttle Inspections onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com

onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com Columbia’s Demise 11 Years Ago Sparked Regular Shuttle Inspections

The Columbia's shuttle fiery end came as the STS-107 astronauts' families were waiting runway-side for everyone to come home. NASA's oldest space shuttle broke up around 9 a.m. Eastern (2 p.m. UTC) on Feb. 1, 2003, scattering debris along east Texas and nearby areas. Its demise was captured on several amateur video cameras, many of which were rebroadcast on news networks.


In the next four months, some 20,000 volunteers fanned out across the southwest United States to find pieces of the shuttle, coming up with 85,000 pieces (38% of the shuttle) as well as human remains. Meanwhile, investigators quickly zeroed in on a piece of foam that fell off of Columbia's external tank and struck the wing. A seven-month inquiry known as the Columbia Accident Investigation Board eventually yielded that as the ultimate cause of the shuttle's demise, although there were other factors as well.


The disaster killed seven people: Rick Husband, Willie McCool, Michael Anderson, Kalpana Chawla, David Brown, Laurel Clark and Ilan Ramon (who was Israel's first astronaut.) At a time when most shuttles were focused on building the International Space Station, this crew's mandate was different: to spend 24 hours a day doing research experiments. Some of the work was recoverable from the crew's 16 days in space.


Columbia’s Demise 11 Years Ago Sparked Regular Shuttle Inspections


A shower of foam debris after the impact on Columbia?s left wing. The event was not observed in real time. Credit: NASA


Columbia's demise brought about several design changes in the external tank as NASA zeroed in on "the foam problem." NASA put in a new procedure in orbit for astronauts to scan the shuttle's belly for broken tiles using the robotic Canadarm and video cameras; shuttles also flew to the International Space Station in such a way so that astronauts on station could take pictures of the bottom.


Return-to-flight mission STS-114 in July-August 2005 yielded more foam loss than expected. Then NASA found something. For a long time, workers at the Michoud Assembly Facility were blamed for improper foam installation after partial tests on external tanks, but an X-ray analysis on an entire tank (done for reasons that are explained in this blog post from then-shuttle manager Wayne Hale) revealed it was actually due to "thermal cycles associated with filling the tank."


"Discovery flew on July 4, 2006; no significant foam loss occurred. I consider that to be the real return to flight for the space shuttle," he wrote. "So were we stupid? Yes. Can you learn from our mistake? I hope so."


Columbia’s Demise 11 Years Ago Sparked Regular Shuttle Inspections S


The Columbia crew. From the left: Mission Specialist David Brown, Commander Rick Husband, Mission Specialists Laurel Clark, Kalpana Chawla and Michael Anderson, Pilot William McCool and Payload Specialist Ilan Ramon. Credit: NASA.




This post by Elizabeth Howell originally appeared at Universe Today. It has been republished with permission.


onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com Columbia’s Demise 11 Years Ago Sparked Regular Shuttle Inspections

What can we actually learn from the UK's first marijuana 'overdose'? onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com

onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com What can we actually learn from the UK's first marijuana 'overdose'?

What can we actually learn from the UK's first marijuana 'overdose'?


Gemma Moss recently became the first woman in Britain "ruled to have been poisoned to death by smoking cannabis," her sudden death referred to by tabloids as "the tragic proof that cannabis can kill." But Moss's story, while undeniably sad, has told us next to nothing about the dangers of pot. At the same time, its coverage has distracted from other, more practical conversations about drug safety and research.


Photo Credit: AP


"I cannot begin to understand the pathologist's certainty that cannabis killed Gemma Moss, but neither do I wish to contradict him outright," writes psychopharmacologist David Nutt in a blog post published yesterday at the website run by the Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs (an organization dedicated to educating the public on the harms and benefits of legal and controlled drugs in the UK).


But when Nutt, a former chief drug advisor to the UK, raises the question of what Moss's case can teach us about the dangers of smoking pot, his response is unequivocal: "I think the answer is nothing."


Nutt isn't being cold – he's being realistic. "Taking any amount of cannabis," he writes, "like all drugs, like so many activities, puts some stresses on the body." He continues:



Cannabis usually makes the heart work a little harder and subtly affects its rate and rhythm. Any minor stress on the body can be the straw that breaks the camel's back, the butterfly's wingbeat that triggers the storm. Ms Moss had suffered with depression, which itself increases the risk of sudden cardiac death. It is quite plausible that the additional small stress caused by that cannabis joint triggered a one-in-a-million cardiac event, just as has been more frequently recorded from sport, sex, saunas and even straining on the toilet.



To suggest that a single incident – in which, it bears repeating, Moss smoked less than a joint's-worth of marijuana – should ever be weighed seriously against weed's history as a drug with no immediately lethal consequences is not only unreasonable, it distracts from more meaningful discussions about the actual dangers posed by drugs, illicit or otherwise:



With scant formal drugs education and negligible public information, our national conversation about drugs is built around the telling of tragic stories like that of Gemma Moss, Leah Betts and Amy Winehouse. Although the facts may be at least part true, these stereotyped stories subtract from rather than adding to the public understanding of drugs... The types of drugs, people and harm in these stories are not representative of the real burden drugs cause in society.



Moreover – and perhaps more importantly – it draws attention away from discussions over the potential benefits that traditionally illicit drugs could have in the treatment of sickness and disease, including psychiatric disorders. Nutt doesn't raise these issues in this specific blog post, but his history vouches for his interest and involvement in the conversation over drugs' untapped therapeutic potential. Nutt was famously dismissed from his position as chief drug advisor to the UK in 2009, after criticizing the government's classification of illegal substances and their potential for inflicting harm – stating, among other things, that ecstasy was statistically no more dangerous than an addiction to horse-riding. In spite of his dismissal, Nutt remains one of the few researchers in the UK licensed to study Class A drugs, those substances thought to pose the greatest harm, or potential harm, to individuals and society. More recently, Nutt has attracted attention for his groundbreaking investigations into psilocybin (the hallucinogenic compound found in magic mushrooms) and MDMA (aka ecstasy) – research he believes could be instrumental in the development of new treatments for disorders like depression or PTSD.


Nutt is far from alone in this thinking. In an editorial published in today's Scientific American, the magazine's editors call for an end to the Drug War's ban on psychoactive drug research, imploring national and international lawmakers to let scientists investigate whether drugs like LSD, marijuana and ecstasy could be used to ease psychiatric disorders:



LSD, ecstasy (MDMA), psilocybin and marijuana have, for decades, been designated as drugs of abuse. But they had their origins in the medical pharmacopeia. Through the mid-1960s, more than 1,000 scientific publications chronicled the ways that LSD could be used as an aid to make psychotherapy more effective. Similarly, MDMA began to be used as a complement to talk therapy in the 1970s. Marijuana has logged thousands of years as a medicament for diseases and conditions ranging from malaria to rheumatism.


National laws and international conventions put a stop to all that. The Controlled Substances Act of 1970 declared that these drugs have "no currently accepted medical use" and classified them in the most stringently regulated category of controlled substances: Schedule I. The resulting restrictions create a de facto ban on their use in both laboratories and clinical trials, setting up a catch-22: these drugs are banned because they have no accepted medical use, but researchers cannot explore their therapeutic potential because they are banned. Three United Nations treaties extend similar restrictions to much of the rest of the world.


The decades-long research hiatus has taken its toll. Psychologists would like to know whether MDMA can help with intractable post-traumatic stress disorder, whether LSD or psilocybin can provide relief for cluster headaches or obsessive-compulsive disorder, and whether the particular docking receptors on brain cells that many psychedelics latch onto are critical sites for regulating conscious states that go awry in schizophrenia and depression.



It's time we had a serious discussion about lifting the ban on psychedelic research – and that discussion can only happen if we're open and honest with one another about the real dangers posed by drugs (and, while we're at it, alcohol) .


"Death by Cannabis?" by David Nutt




"End the Ban on Psychoactive Drug Research" by The Editors at Scientific American


onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com What can we actually learn from the UK's first marijuana 'overdose'?

25% of Russian Men are Dead by Age 55 onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com

onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com 25% of Russian Men are Dead by Age 55

25% of Russian Men are Dead by Age 55


A full quarter of Russian men die before their 55th birthday. Compare that to America's 1% and the UK's 7%. Why the disparity? There's a good chance it has something to do with the country's vodka consumption.


Top photo by christian.senger via flickr


Via USA Today:



Researchers tracked about 151,000 adult men in the Russian cities of Barnaul, Byisk and Tomsk from 1999 to 2010. They interviewed them about their drinking habits and, when about 8,000 later died, followed up to monitor their causes of death.


The risk of dying before age 55 for those who said they drank three or more half-liter bottles of vodka a week was a shocking 35%.


It's not clear how many Russian men drink three bottles or more a week. Lead researcher Sir Richard Peto of Oxford University said the average Russian adult drinks 20 liters of vodka per year while the average Briton drinks about three liters of spirits.


"The rate of men dying prematurely in Russia is totally out of line with the rest of Europe," [said lead researcher Sir Richard Peto of Oxford University]. "There's also a heavy drinking culture in Finland and Poland but they still have nothing like Russia's risk of death."



The researchers' findings are published in the latest issue of The Lancet.


[The Lancet via USA Today]


onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com 25% of Russian Men are Dead by Age 55