Tampilkan postingan dengan label 2014 at 01:28AM. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label 2014 at 01:28AM. Tampilkan semua postingan

Kamis, 06 Maret 2014

Here's what American 8th graders think about high tech spying onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com

Written By 12; About: Here's what American 8th graders think about high tech spying onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com on Kamis, 06 Maret 2014

onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com Here's what American 8th graders think about high tech spying

News channel C-SPAN just announced the winners in its StudentCam competition, where people in grades 6-8 produced short news segments that answered the question, "What's the most important issue the U.S. Congress should consider in 2014?" Their answer? Government spying.


The winning documentary (above) and the second place winner (below) were both about NSA spying on U.S. citizens. This suggests that one of the formative political experiences for people coming of age in the early 21st century is going to be mass surveillance. The future dystopia that science fiction writers of the 20th century dreamed about has become this generation's reality.


The best part is that neither of these films accepts spying as "normal," even though it's the reality that all of these filmmakers have grown up with. Instead, they are questioning whether it was right for the NSA to spy on domestic communications. And they are trying to figure out why it happened.


Here's what C-SPAN said about the winning documentary:



Peter Jasperse, Antonia Torfs-Leibman and Madeleine Hutchins, eighth graders at Eastern Middle School in Silver Spring, Md., are national First Prize winners in the Middle School division. Peter, Antonia and Madeleine will share $3,000 for their First Prize documentary, 'The NSA: The Lengths of America's Security,' about NSA surveillance."



The second place winner is by middle schooler Ben Blum from San Rafael, CA, and it's called "Data Obsession."


Both documentaries will air on C-SPAN in April.


Spotted on EFF's Deep Links


onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com Here's what American 8th graders think about high tech spying

Senin, 24 Februari 2014

I just can’t stop watching this mindblowing machine bend wires onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com

Written By 12; About: I just can’t stop watching this mindblowing machine bend wires onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com on Senin, 24 Februari 2014

onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com I just can’t stop watching this mindblowing machine bend wires

I just can’t stop watching this mindblowing machine bend wires


Seriously. Watching this awesome machine bend wires in different shapes puts my brain into deep hypnotized mode. The manufacturer claims it is the fastest wire bending machine in the world. I don't know if that's true or not, but it's unreal.




SPLOID is a new blog about awesome stuff. Join us on Facebook


onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com I just can’t stop watching this mindblowing machine bend wires

Senin, 10 Februari 2014

Vampire Academy shows how terrible films happen to great filmmakers onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com

Written By 12; About: Vampire Academy shows how terrible films happen to great filmmakers onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com on Senin, 10 Februari 2014

onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com Vampire Academy shows how terrible films happen to great filmmakers

Vampire Academy shows how terrible films happen to great filmmakers S


Vampire Academy should have been a great film. It's based on an addictively wonderful book by Richelle Mead. It was written and directed by the Waters brothers, who separately directed Mean Girls and wrote Heathers. So why is it such a terrible, inept piece of film-making? And what can we learn from it?


Spoilers ahead...


The Vampire Thing.


So probably the first thing that went wrong with Vampire Academy is the "vampire" thing. People, at this point, are pretty sick of vampires, after years of Twilight and True Blood and Vampire Diaries. Vampires aren't just overexposed — zombies are overexposed too, but they keep coming — they're associated with a certain brand of soapy gothic melodrama and a fanbase that's obsessive and (horrors!) mostly female.


So in fact, the Vampire Academy movie compulsively tries to distance itself from the genre it belongs to, throwing in some feeble Twilight jokes and pretending that the "V-word" is some kind of tawdry mislabeling of its noble blood-drinkers.


Vampire Academy shows how terrible films happen to great filmmakers S


In fact, Mead's Vampire Academy books are like nothing else out there, despite having the requisite love triangles, angst and misunderstood heroines. For one thing, the core of the first book is a beautiful story about a friendship between two girls, the Princess Vasilisa Dragomir (aka Lissa) and her protector, Rose Hathaway. They're so close that Rose can actually see through Lissa's eyes, and Rose is an angry brawler in Lissa's defense. Lissa is a Moroi, part of the bloodsucking royalty, whereas Rose is a half-human Dhampir. They're threatened by the Strigoi, who are basically Moroi gone bad.


The other core of the first Vampire Academy book is a story about slut-shaming, as everybody suspects (rightly) that Rose let Lissa drink her blood when they were on the run from the Academy for a year. This is the biggest taboo in their society, and Dhampirs who let Moroi drink their blood are consigned to brothels, to become "blood whores," useless for anything but sex and blood-drinking. Soon some boys are claiming that Rose let them drink her blood, too, and she's falsely accused of being the school blood slut.


It's actually pretty intense and weird — and a representation of adolescence that the ever-more-prolific young-adult fiction genre has seldom represented.


Making it a comedy


So the second mistake was probably trying to turn this super-emotional, heartfelt story into a straight-up comedy, and hiring the guys behind Mean Girls and Heathers to make it happen. You can see the logic of doing this: It's a story about girls and bullying, and the Waters brothers are responsible for two of the most famous films in that niche.


The problem is, so much of what's going on in Vampire Academy is really internal, and we really need to be able to feel the inner lives of these characters — especially Rose, who has to struggle with fearing that she really is the person they all think she is. And nothing in the book is simple, as Rose loathes the Moroi snobs but also wants Lissa to take her rightful place among them. If you don't feel Rose's rage, passion and internalized self-loathing, then this story simply falls apart.


Vampire Academy shows how terrible films happen to great filmmakers S


In fact, that's what happens — everything in the movie is played for a joke, and instead of having intense emotions that she barely knows what to do with, Rose is played as sort of a young Tina Fey. (With maybe a hint of Ellen Page?) She's constantly cracking wise, and seems kind of detached from all the action around her. Her tragic crush on her hot Dhampir instructor Dimitri, her confusing feelings about her best friend, her social awkwardness — it's all sort of treated as a slightly depressing joke, rather than something keenly felt.


You could imagine the Waters brothers making a brand new vampire comedy from scratch, about vampire mean girls and their pranks that progressively get more deadly — and maybe it would be watchable. But unfortunately, they're stuck with the ill-fitting Vampire Academy, in which the "mean girls" are just part of a larger and more intricate storyline.


It's kind of surreal, if you've read the Vampire Academy book, to watch the movie and see it cycle through pretty much exactly the same plot points — except that they all fall flat because they're played for laughs in a weak fashion.


And that's the thing: The Waters Brothers might have seemed like a good fit for this property at a glance, because "teen girls" and "bullying," but once you glance a tiny bit closer, they start to look like the worst possible fit. Because the brothers' strong suit, their zany irony, only distances you from the heart of the material, the emotional story — and without that heart, the thing is dead on arrival.


Forgetting to make it funny


But even that doesn't really get to the heart of what's wrong here. Because the Vampire Academy isn't funny, at all — not even as a "so bad it's good" film. There are maybe one or two quotable lines of dialogue in the entire thing. The humor feels mostly forced — and worse, as though the characters are as bored with all this as we are.


Here's a sample line of dialogue from the film: "You Dragomirs are all such drags."


Vampire Academy shows how terrible films happen to great filmmakers S


And also, the humor is pressed into service to deliver the exposition that the movie is too blasé to deliver in an effective manner. The first ten minutes of the film consist entirely of characters having "As you know, Bob" conversations with each other, interspersed with a painfully bludgeony voiceover from Rose, in which she fills in the gaps. And it never stops — the whole movie is full of bland exposition, gussied up with a layer of snark that's supposed to make it funny.


It's not just that the Waters brothers are unable to convey the complexity of this world without spoonfeeding the viewers information — fair enough, there's a lot going on here. It's also that they don't have any interest in conveying anything throughany other means.


Halfway through the movie, Lissa turns to Rose and says, "You're the impulsive one and I'm the cautious one." As if the movie just realized that these crucial character traits probably hadn't come across at all up to this point. (And they hadn't, sadly.) So the movie needs to explain the characters to us in shorthand.


Vampire Academy shows how terrible films happen to great filmmakers S


The clunky humor and weak exposition are actually just symptoms of a bigger problem: the "cliff's notes" scene-setting. Every single scene in this movie feels like the cliff's notes of a proper scene, which might not even be longer but might feature people actually interacting and talking like real people. Every scene consists of the characters narrating the outlines of the scene, rather than actually experiencing the scene. I've seen this in a lot of other bad movies, lately, and it seems to be a symptom of film-makers feeling alienated from their material.


The ineptness doesn't stop there, either — the main actors in the film all seem painfully miscast. I'm sure they're all great actors, but pretty much none of them seems to be able to work with their characters as written. As mentioned, Zoey Deutch seems weirdly detached as Rose, Lucy Fry is sort of anemic as Lissa, and Olga Kurylenko seems unsure whether the headmistress is supposed to be drunk all the time.


Vampire Academy shows how terrible films happen to great filmmakers S


Every action scene in the movie is shot in a weird parody of the "shaky cam" style so that you have a vague impression of motion at the edge of the frame. The CG creatures that show up at the end of the movie seem honestly apologetic for their "Lawnmower Man on crack" badness. The whole thing is incredibly choppy, and if any suspense or drama managed to seep in somehow, it would leak out through the massive holes in the scene-setting.


Not respecting the material or the audience


But honestly, none of that stuff is the root of the problem. The root of the problem appears to be a lack of respect for the books, and for the people who love them. At least, that's the message I get from the actual film, which seems to roll its eyes at the whole notion of a fancy boarding school for vampires, or vampire aristocracy, or a secret war against evil super-vampires.


There are two ways of turning this material into a comedy: one is to invest fully in the reality of what's going on, and find a way to laugh in the midst of the pain. (To do Vampire Diaries, basically.) And the other is to treat the whole thing as a flimsy charade, in which no sensible person could possibly care about any of this, and why bother even trying to make sense of it? The latter approach smacks of disdain for the actually-quite-good books, but it's also a surefire way to make a film that doesn't work as a comedy or as a vampire saga.


Vampire Academy shows how terrible films happen to great filmmakers S


And that's really the crux of the problem: whether it's the Waters' fault or someone else's, Vampire Academy shows that if you don't respect the story you've set out to tell, then you're not going to succeed in rising above it. You're not going to create some triumphant spoof that transcends the tawdriness of your source. Instead, you'll end up making something infinitely worse, that not only lets down everyone who loved the thing you're mocking, but also fails on its own terms.


onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com Vampire Academy shows how terrible films happen to great filmmakers

Jumat, 07 Februari 2014

The Most Unfortunate Design Flaws in the Human Body onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com

Written By 12; About: The Most Unfortunate Design Flaws in the Human Body onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com on Jumat, 07 Februari 2014

onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com The Most Unfortunate Design Flaws in the Human Body

The Most Unfortunate Design Flaws in the Human Body S


Sometimes evolution is stupid, and the human body is proof. Here are the most problematic physical and behavioral "scars of evolution" we humans have to deal with.


The human body is, in many respects, a resounding tribute to the adaptive powers of natural selection. We've evolved gloriously large, complex brains capable of abstract thought and foresight. We're bipedal, dextrous, and enjoy relatively long lives (lives that include a fairly generous fertility window), to list a few of the qualities that have allowed us to propagate and thrive across the planet.


But that doesn't mean we're perfect. Far from it, in fact. Not only did evolution create a species that's "good enough," it also produced some distinctly negative traits. Back in 1951, the biologist Wilton Krogman referred to these as the "scars of human evolution."


In some respects, these "scars" can be seen as vestigial traits, but that's not quite accurate. Rather, they're examples of the various trade-offs and side-effects of evolution. They're also not physical or psychological limitations per se (like our poor sense of smell or inability to grasp large numbers — those traits weren't adaptive in our recent evolutionary past). Also, I left out aging and age-related disorders; those aren't so much "flaws" of evolution as they're an indelible and insurmountable limitation of biological evolution. Lastly, I decided to include some characteristics that evolution designed rather poorly.


Without further ado here are humanity's most unfortunate design flaws; please add any that you think I overlooked to the comments.


Physical Characteristics


The Dual Function of the Pharynx


This is one of the most problematic "features" of the human body — and the cause of innumerable deaths throughout human history. Like many other primates, we're forced to use the same anatomical structure for both ingestion and respiration. But when obstructed, airflow is blocked, which can lead to choking, and in some cases, death.


Our Inability to Biosynthesize Vitamin C


Vitamin C plays a crucial role as an anti-oxidant and in collagen synthesis. But certain animals, such as primates, guinea pigs, and some bats and birds, have completely lost the ability to synthesize this compound. So, when Vitamin C-rich food sources are scarce, such as fruits, we experience a weakened immune response — not to mention scurvy in extreme cases.


Also, because we can't make all the vitamins we need, we carry a host of deadly bacteria in our bowels, which produce them for us. But when this process is disrupted, like a hole in the intestine, it can flare into peritonitis.


The Awkward Wiring of the Male Urinary Tract


The urinary tract in males passes through — rather than being routed around — the prostate gland, which can swell and block urinary function.


The Close Proximity of our Genitals to our Rectum


Not only is this aesthetically displeasing, it's also unhygienic. Combined with our short urethras — especially in women — this leads to frequent urinary tract and bladder infections (UTIs) (remember, front to back, ladies). As the character Darald quipped in Forgetting Sarah Marshall, "Let me just say that if God was a city planner he would not put a playground next to a sewage system."


Our Multi-Function Genitals


Relatedly, our genitals are forced to perform multiple functions. While on the one hand it can be seen as conservation in design, it creates health problems. Again, it's unhygienic. For women, sexual intercourse pushes bacteria further into the urethra, leading to UTIs. Additionally, both men and women can contract UTIs from two sexually transmitted bacteria, chlamydia and mycoplasma. And of course, for women, this is also the part of the body where, in addition to sex and urination, newborn babies come out.


The Extremely Narrow Human Birth Canal


Speaking of which, human females have an unreasonably narrow birth canal, resulting in significantly increased risks to both mother and child during birth (not to mention prolonged labors and extreme levels of discomfort). In fact, death in childbirth used to be the leading cause of death for women during their reproductive years (our big, bulbous heads also has something to do with it). This is a consequence of our quick evolutionary leap from quadrupeds to bipeds, resulting in our narrow pelvis — the passage through which newborn babies pass.


Our Over-Loaded Lower Backs


This is also a consequence of our transition from four-legged to two-legged creatures. According to paleoanthropologist Bruce Latimer of Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio,



When humans stood upright, they took a spine that had evolved to be stiff for climbing and moving in trees and rotated it 90 degrees, so it was vertical—a task Latimer compared to stacking 26 cups and saucers on top of each other (vertebrae and discs) and then, balancing a head on top. But so as not to obstruct the birth canal and to get the torso balanced above our feet, the spine has to curve inwards (lordosis), creating the hollow of our backs. That's why our spines are shaped like an "S." All that curving, with the weight of the head and stuff we carry stacked on top, creates pressure that causes back problems—especially if you play football, do gymnastics, or swim the butterfly stroke. In the United States alone, 700,000 people suffer vertebral fractures per year and back problems are the sixth leading human malady in the world. "If you take care of it, your spine will get you through to about 40 or 50," said Latimer. "After that, you're on your own."



Our Achy Knees


Again, an aftereffect of bipedalism. We have to distribute all our weight on just two limbs, which often leads to aches and pains. You can also add achy, or arthritic hips, to this list.


The Overly Complicated Human Foot


Anthropologist Jeremy DeSilva of Boston University put it this way:



Starting with the foot, DeSilva held up a cast with 26 bones and said: "You wouldn't design it out of 26 moving parts." Our feet have so many bones because our ape-like ancestors needed flexible feet to grasp branches. But as they moved out of the trees and began walking upright on the ground in the past 5 million years or so, the foot had to become more stable, and bit by bit, the big toe, which was no longer opposable, aligned itself with the other toes and our ancestors developed an arch to work as a shock absorber. "The foot was modified to remain rigid," said DeSilva. "A lot of BandAids were stuck on these bones." But the bottom line was that our foot still has a lot of room to twist inwards and outwards, and our arches collapse. This results in: ankle sprains, plantar fasciitis, Achilles tendonitis, shin splints, and broken ankles. These are not modern problems, due to stiletto heels; Fossils show broken ankles that have healed as far back as 3 million years ago.


A better design for upright walking and running, DeSilva said, would be a foot and ankle like an ostrich. An ostrich's ankle and lower leg bones are fused into a single structure, which puts a kick into their step—and their foot has only two toes that aid in running. "Why can't I have a foot like that?" asked DeSilva. One reason is that ostriches trace their upright locomotion back 230 million years to the age of dinosaurs, while our ancestors walked upright just 5 million years ago.



Our Inefficient Sinuses


Humans have several sinuses — air-filled cavities that help with drainage of mucus and fluid. But our maxillary sinuses, located on our cheekbone, drain upwards. This often leads to the build-up of fluids and mucus, which can cause an infection.


The "Blind Spot" in Our Eyes


Our so-called "blind spot" is the result of a quirk that happens during embryological development. To deal with this, we've had to evolve elaborate and costly perception-correcting mechanisms. Our very own Esther Inglis-Arkell describes it like this:



Light gets into the eye by passing through the pupil. It hits the retina at the back of the eye. The retina is covered with light-sensing proteins. They relay what they sense to the optic nerve which carries the information back into the brain. The problem is, the optic nerve ends in the field of the retina itself. This is a little like having to plug the power cable for a TV directly into the screen. It creates a dark spot. Most of the time, the other eye will see what's happening in its partner's blind, but if the blind spots overlap while looking at a certain object, or if the person is only looking through one eye, the brain just fills in the spot looking at the surrounding picture.



A Single Set of Adult Teeth


This is where evolution got unreasonably cheap on us, providing humans with just one set of teeth for our entire adult lives. Once we hit 35, our teeth start to go — one of many signs that evolution primed us for reproduction, followed by a brief period of child-rearing, and pretty much nothing else (unless you subscribe to the grandmother hypothesis).


Behavioral Characteristics


Our fondness for sweet, salty, and fatty foods


Our bodies need sugar, salt, and fat — just not in extreme quantities. But in a state of nature, these foods are often scarce or difficult to preserve. That's why we find these food unreasonably delicious and irresistible. It's our body's way of saying, "Yo, eat this stuff while you can, it's good for you." But most of us now live in a world of tremendous abundance, and we consume these foods in ridiculous quantities, leading to all sorts of modern health problems.


Tribalism


Humans have a kind of ingrained fear or distrust of the "out-group." It's a previously adaptive trait that binds small groups of individuals together and prevents them from wandering off or joining other groups. But it also leads to ethnocentrism and divisions between groups. Studies show that oxytocin, while strengthening feelings of trust between individuals, increases fear of "the other." This characteristic was obviously important back when we lived in family clans or tribal arrangements, but today it leads to all sorts of social problems, including racism, prejudice, and our inability to empathize with people we don't immediately know.


Any Number of Cognitive Biases


Many of our cognitive biases — annoying glitches in our thinking that cause us to make questionable decisions and reach erroneous conclusions — are a consequence of our limited intelligence and predisposed tendencies. Examples include the confirmation bias (we love to agree with people who agree with us), the gambler's fallacy (the tremendous weight we tend to put on previous events that aren't causal factors), our tendency to neglect or misjudge probability, and the status-quo bias (we often make choices that guarantee that things remain the same). Some of these are adaptive traits, but others are simply cognitive deficiencies.


Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder


This is an example of how we've potentially pathologized a perfectly "normal" human psychological characteristic. Because ADHD appears to have a genetic component (it affects about 5% of school-aged children), questions have been raised about its prior role as a trait required for survival, namely its adaptive function in hunter, fighter, and wader theories. But today, we see it as something maladaptive — something that needs to be treated. Put another way, and like our penchant for sweet, salty, and fatty foods, it's a trait that's not so much nonoptimal as it's ill suited for present-day society.


Other sources: Better Than Human, WebMD, "Human Evolution: Gain Came With Pain".


Follow me on Twitter: @dvorsky

Related Related Related Related Related Related

onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com The Most Unfortunate Design Flaws in the Human Body

Selasa, 04 Februari 2014

Transformers transforming Supercut onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com

Written By 12; About: Transformers transforming Supercut onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com on Selasa, 04 Februari 2014

onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com Transformers transforming Supercut

Alle Transformers-Transformationen in 10 Minuten auf HD. Macht sogar Michael Bay-Filme erträglich und ich würde nie zugeben, dass ich alle drei Teile auf Bluray besitze und manchmal wie ein 12jähriger einfach nur Giant Robots Beating The Shit Out Of Each Other anschaue. Niemals würde ich das zugeben.


onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com Transformers transforming Supercut