Tampilkan postingan dengan label 2014 at 11:55PM. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label 2014 at 11:55PM. Tampilkan semua postingan

Kamis, 27 Februari 2014

In a future of lab-grown food, could you eat meat made of celebrities? onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com

Written By 12; About: In a future of lab-grown food, could you eat meat made of celebrities? onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com on Kamis, 27 Februari 2014

onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com In a future of lab-grown food, could you eat meat made of celebrities?

In a future of lab-grown food, could you eat meat made of celebrities?


An alleged startup claims that it wants to make and sell "artisinal salami" made from celebrity tissue samples. Even if it's a joke, it begs the question: What are the ethics of consuming lab-grown human meat?


BiteLabs claims to be a biotech startup focused on cultivating and selling celebrity meat for human consumption. Perhaps taking inspiration from Brandon Cronenberg's film Antiviral, in which people can infect themselves with celebrity pathogens and eat meat grown from celebrity cells, BiteLabs says that it would biopsy celebrities, cultivate their tissue in a lab, and then mix it with animal meats to create their sausages.


Many folks have assumed that BiteLabs is a hoax, a parody of startup culture. Through an email conversation with Vice, a BiteLabs spokesperson made it sound more like an art project than a legitimate startup, saying, "BiteLabs is 100% serious in prompting widespread discussion about bioethics, lab-grown meats, and celebrity culture - this is very important to us."


This invites jokes about "eating the rich," but let's consider the question of whether it would be ethical to eat human meat—celebrity meat in particular—grown in a lab. Researchers have been working on cultivating lab-grown meat for human consumption in hopes of creating, for example, a hamburger that requires no animal suffering. At the same time, lab-cultivated human tissues offer great promise in terms of medical care. This isn't the first time that someone has considered whether the two ideas might be married and that we might be able to consume lab-grown human meat. In a 2010 piece, Popular Science asked the question of whether eating lab-grown human tissue would make a person a cannibal. The key idea that came up in the piece was that this sort of sanitized cannibalism represented an objectification and commodification of the human body.


The commodification of human tissue has been an issue in scientific research. Consider the case of Henrietta Lacks, whose immortal line of cervical cancer cells (the HeLa cells) have been sold by research companies even though her family never gave permission, nor received compensation for the use of the cells. With the idea of celebrity meat, there is the added idea of fetishization, and the idea that these people are a commodity who could be quite literally consumed.


And that seems to be a key point of the BiteLabs project—the things that we want and demand from our celebrities. The project invites people to tweet at four different celebrities: James Franco, Jennifer Lawrence, Kanye West, and Ellen DeGeneres, asking them to consent to a biopsy so their tissues could be cultivate. The very idea that people are tweeting at these human beings, saying to them, "I want to see you turned into something I can eat," is itself nauseating. The question then becomes, in what other ways are we treating our celebrities as pieces of meat for our metaphorical consumption?


BiteLabs [via MetaFilter]


onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com In a future of lab-grown food, could you eat meat made of celebrities?

Rabu, 29 Januari 2014

Red mercury is the coolest substance that never existed onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com

Written By 12; About: Red mercury is the coolest substance that never existed onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com on Rabu, 29 Januari 2014

onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com Red mercury is the coolest substance that never existed

Red mercury is the coolest substance that never existed


We know that red mercury makes the manufacturing of nuclear bombs much, much easier. We don't exactly know how it manages to do this, but that's only because red mercury, as far as we know, doesn't exist.


In the swinging 1970s, the design for nuclear bombs at the time required two explosion. A primary explosion was caused by material that could undergo fission splitting its atoms. That explosion squeezed a secondary material, which underwent fusion, melding its atoms together and causing the actual boom.


Fissionable material is hard to come by; the odd isotope of an element that is prone to fission would have to be strained from many that aren't prone to fusion. The difference between the two isotopes could be nothing more than one proton, so the process takes years of work with expensive and huge equipment. Red mercury could separate fissionable isotopes quickly and easily.


Or perhaps red mercury just meant you needed a great deal less fissionable material for the primary explosion in the first place. Or perhaps red mercury was an explosive all on its own, and cut out the need for fissionable material. And then there are the people who heard that it was a kind of spray-on material that made the bombs stealthy and guided warheads to their target.


The rumors continue to this day. Some, like the one that claims red mercury was a chemical that acts as both stealth technology and a missile guidance system, aren't given much credence, but others have at least the backing of credible sources. Samuel Cohen, a well-respected scientist who did work on new innovations in nuclear bombs, believed that red mercury was a chemical that, when compressed, produced the explosive force of fissionable material and so eliminated the need for an outer layer on a bomb. Other scientists claim that this is impossible. Perhaps the most credible rumor is the one that takes some of the mystery out of red mercury. It might have been a nickname or a code name for Lithium-6, which helps put a bang into fissionable material. In that case it would just be a new, cooler name, for an already-known substance.


Most intriguingly, there's a rumor that various law enforcement agencies just invented red mercury so they could catch potential terrorists trying to acquire the wonder material. In the early 1990s, ex-Soviet conmen selling red mercury were caught, along with their clients. Technically they were selling red mercury — it was regular mercury dyed with nail polish.


Do you think red mercury exists? And if so, how much are you charging?


[Via The Guardian, BBC]


onlinecollegedegreee.blogspot.com Red mercury is the coolest substance that never existed